Many rejoiced, but the fight to the summit launches greenhouse gas cartel with makeup. Climatologists: the global temperature will decline naturally
Cancun - Onanism rampant, one of the defendants in Cancun. Words perhaps less colorful, certainly less vulgar, but making the same concept are the one for the Corriere della Sera, Alessandra Arachi, who on Sunday had the courage to write: "the meeting of the countries of the world has applauded itself ' . Unique words in a whole sheet of elation evoked from the first page of the Milan daily, which triumphantly headlined: "Climate, a surprise agreement in Cancun."
no less triumphant Republic has reserved the title to his correspondent, the usual Cianciullo without but reserve the right, this time, the honors of the recall on the front page. On the other hand, it takes a thick layer of bronze to give the honors to one who writes as Cianciullo wrote, probably without a blush, that "the Chinese leadership in clean energy." The Chinese? It is at least five years who install a coal every 10 days (yes, you read that right: one every 10 days), while their electrical generation is from wind pool to 0.7% and 0.01% from the sun, and would, the Chinese leadership in clean energy? A phrase that I could write myself because I know that from coal, as it is produced by our plants, and clean energy; but do not write because I'm not sure that the Chinese plants are the same type that we use. Cancun
Cianciullo called "a success of the environmentalists." Pleased him. The agreement, inform the reporter of the Republic: 1) calls for "reducing emissions by 25-40% by 2020 ', 2) the purpose establishing a fund, managed by the World Bank of 10 billion dollars a year for 3 years, but with a desire to make them 100 per year until 2020, and 3) supports the requirement to maintain the temperature rises (literally) 'within 2 degrees, preferably within the 1.5 degrees by the end of century. "
I understand that 30 billion would rejoice anyone (let alone the bankers) that if we get 100 billion a year calling for a nice toast (the bankers, then, would be eager to drink, even to our health, for what it costs them). But I do not understand what is the rapture of the environmentalists. If Cancun had approved and implemented what they have not approved, that is not 10 but 100 billion a year by 2020, would be 1 trillion. What if everyone involved in the nuclear reactor and allow you to install 300 to produce 300 GW (gigawatts), representing a reduction of emissions by 6%. With one trillion dollars but you can install 1,000 GW wind power, but produce 200 GW power (the wind does not blow always), representing a reduction of emissions by 4%. Or, again with 1,000 billion dollars, you can install 200 GW photovoltaic, but produce 20 GW of electricity (the sun does not shine forever), representing a reduction of emissions equivalent to 0.4%. Whatever you do, we are far from the minimum of 25% subscribed to Cancun from suckers of the world. To which the palm, and with a bang, goes to the Indian environment minister, described as "charismatic" by a Cianciullo ecstatic that there reports the comment: "There are times when the spirit of place must take precedence over procedure." Boh? I insist: the ministers of the environment should be abolished.
But both fools, perhaps, not were those of Cancun: official entity you move the goal of reducing emissions to the size of the reduction temperature was a stroke of true masters. If the temperature of the globe will fall (as the best climate, as young and imperfect, expected), these gentlemen will toast to the success and credit those reductions to their 16 unnecessary meetings. If temperatures are reduced, we will instead argue that "we must do more 'do not want 1000, but 10 trillion. Of the two: either the crisis does not exist, or they are the cause.
The best characterization of the cancan in Cancun was given, once again, but perhaps unwittingly, sent the good of Corser, where I quoted in the article writes: "the pride of the Mexican agreement was the desire to reaffirm the Kyoto Protocol." You should know that this protocol, signed in 1997 and came into force in 2003, provides for the reduction of emissions by 5% compared to 1997, except that today those emissions have increased by 5% in the 'virtuous Europe and 20 % worldwide, compared to those of 1997. If this was the flagship of Cancun, just imagine the rest. However, the idle data in Cancun have their 17th meeting, next year in South Africa: let comfortable, but look at our portfolios.
Di Franco Battagllia
Source:
0 comments:
Post a Comment